{"id":57792,"date":"2017-12-08T08:51:46","date_gmt":"2017-12-08T13:51:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.21cpw.com\/?p=57792"},"modified":"2017-12-08T09:22:32","modified_gmt":"2017-12-08T14:22:32","slug":"apwu-prc-proposes-changes-to-ratemaking-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.21cpw.com\/apwu-prc-proposes-changes-to-ratemaking-system\/","title":{"rendered":"APWU: PRC Proposes Changes to Ratemaking System"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/i><\/a><\/span>\n<\/i><\/a><\/span>\n<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Web News Article #: 117-2017<\/strong>
\n\"\"12\/07\/2017 – The PRC just issued their long-awaited proposal to change how much the Postal Service can raise postage rates of market dominant products. (Market dominant products include first class letters and cards, periodicals, and Standard\/Market Mail; but do not include most package products which are \u201ccompetitive\u201d products.)<\/p>\n

The 2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA) instituted two changes that manufactured a postal financial crisis. First, the PAEA forced the Postal Service to pre-fund retiree health benefits 75 years into the future, draining $5.5 billion\/year from the postal treasury. This is an absurd burden required of no other agency or company. Second, the PAEA capped future postal rate increases at the Consumer Price Index (CPI). This was a boon to the giant mailing industry.<\/p>\n

Combined, these requirements starved the Postal Service of much needed revenue. They became the justification for lowering service standards, slowing down mail delivery, closing processing plants and post offices, reducing retail operations, cutting jobs, and pressured the USPS to increase subcontracting and reduce six-day delivery.<\/p>\n

Ten-Year Review Complete<\/h4>\n

The PAEA authorized the PRC to do a ten-year review to assess whether the rate cap system met the objectives of the PAEA, which included assurance of \u201cadequate revenue, including retained earnings, to maintain financial stability.\u201d The APWU argued<\/span><\/a> in our comments<\/span><\/a> as part of the ten year review that the price cap should be eliminated because it deprived the Postal Service of the ability to meet its objectives.<\/p>\n

The PRC in their ten year review found that the price cap system did not generate enough money for the USPS to meet its goals and objectives. To fix the problem and meet the objectives of the PAEA, the PRC proposes to revise the cap to generate more revenue. Specifically, the PRC advocates for a CPI plus 2% a year cap for five years with a new review after five years. They made several other recommendations.<\/p>\n

These are positive steps forward. Unfortunately, they are only half measures. With these revisions, the Postal Service will continue to struggle financially and will lack sufficient capital to maintain and improve its networks and operations.<\/p>\n

A 90-day comment period follows with an additional 30-days for reply comments. After comments, the PRC is expected to issue final regulations.<\/p>\n

The APWU will actively participate in this process, as we continue to advocate that there should be no arbitrary price cap. \u201cThe APWU supports reasonable postal rates for the people of the country,\u201d said President Dimondstein. \u201cHowever, the CPI cap, along with huge pre-sort discounts, keep rates artificially low for the profits of the big corporate mailers.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe price cap, even with the proposed changes, deprives the Postal Service of needed revenue to maintain and improve facilities, update the fleet, expand new products and innovate, and serves to depress wages and benefits for hard-working postal workers,\u201d he continued. \u201cThe APWU will continue to work for fair and sensible rate-setting regulations so that the Postal Office can continue to serve the public and fulfill its constitutionally mandated mission.\u201d<\/p>\n

Source:\u00a0APWU<\/a><\/em>
\n