APWU: Arbitrator Denies Severance Pay Grievance

APWU Web News Article #: 3-2017
01/06/2017 – From 2003 to 2009 the Postal Service offered a series of Voluntary Early Retirements (VER) with the approval of the Office of Personnel Management. Employees involved in these offers were not paid any severance pay. In 2008 the APWU filed a grievance concerning the failure to pay severance to certain employees.

The general rule is that severance is not paid to employees who terminate postal employment but are entitled to an immediate annuity payment like an optional retirement or a VER. The one exception is found in the layoff provisions of the contract (Article 6.B.4) which provides that an employee can receive both a severance and a VER.

The Postal Service argued that Article 6 layoff provisions were not invoked or applicable to the VER offers USPS had been making; but rather the offers were made to facilitate Article 12 reassignments. Article 12 has no provisions similar to the severance pay provisions in Article 6.

Arbitrator Shyam Das agreed with the Postal Service that the triggering events were reassignments under Article 12 and not Article 6; therefore, severance pay was not due.

Source:  APWU

One thought on “APWU: Arbitrator Denies Severance Pay Grievance

  1. Union and NAME of Local/Branch
    APWU - Virginia Beach Local
    Email Address
    zjbronxgirl@aol.com

    I started my career with the USPS Feb 1986. I retired in 2008 on the VER. I think all employees that chose to take the early out should have received severance pay. Choosing to take the VER should have not caused us to lose out on our pay that was due just like everybody else. We took the early out because our of own personal reasons. We also left when the economy was at is worst. We left with nothing at a time that we really needed the help.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *